Duolingo Bird Murders User After Leaving Lessons to 11pm for 25th Consecutive Day

Johnny is dead. The ‘official’ cause of death is ‘suicide’ by stabbing himself with a knife 28 times. Everyone really knows, however, that this is a cover up story, and Johnny did not kill himself. In reality, the elites were covering up the crimes of one of their own – the self-proclaimed master of languages, Duo.

Johnny had begun using the infamous app Duolingo during the mid-year break after his family nagged him to join and his excuse of being ‘busy’ now failed. His initial scepticism had quickly turned into enthusiasm over the first two weeks. He was nailing the beginner Korean lessons with ease, he was collecting XP and gems at a rate that rivals the wealth of Jeff Bezos, and his streak was skyrocketing. This was much better than any prestigious ‘formal’ lessons of language learning encouraged by the elites. Surely this would last, and Johnny would become effectively a natural speaker of Korean.

It did not last. The seemingly cute and bubbly bird Duo and all the other characters drawn in a late 2010s corporate art style that only looks good compared to the AI slop prominent now were becoming increasingly grating to Johnny. Especially their non-stop promotion of ‘Super Duolingo’ because everything has to be fucking subscription based these days. Basically, nothing since the first few lessons had been retained, putting a slight bit of doubt that random apps are the best way to learn difficult new skills. The lessons were a grind, with the progress bar deliberately misleading him, suggesting more of the lesson is complete than reality. To make matters even worse, his family who had begged him to join the app in the first place had all given up, leaving hard-earned friend streaks to crumble like the Roman Empire.

The only things at this stage keeping Johnny from folding like Ed Sheeran and giving up on Duolingo was the sunk cost fallacy and the fear of what the Duo bird would do to him. The big fancy number on his streak was taunting him. One missed day and all the progress would vanish. Johnny simply could not let that happen despite his wishes. The Duo bird watching over him had grown more antagonistic as Johnny left his lessons later and later with each passing week and the quantity of lessons dwindled to the bare minimum.

Finally, after 25 days of leaving lessons until 11pm, Duo’s rage expanded beyond an angry stare from the phone. Duo emerged from the phone with a knife, and left Johnny with 28 stab wounds to ensure his final lesson from Duolingo would not be forgotten (unlike everything else for the past two months). Duo then slipped back into the app like nothing had ever happened, with a misleadingly optimistic demeanour that would continue to lure many more into the greatest trap of their lives.

추가 소식 예정.

GPS Debaters Suddenly Social Justice Warriors When Paired Against Girls’ School

Following a dominant GPS season, where the irrelevancy of issues like human rights went uncontested, the Churchie 10.7s have made a philosophical about-turn after being drawn against a girls’ school in round one of QDU.

“We did some exercises in basic human empathy,” explained their coach, “now I just have to hope they don’t absolutely cook this short prep with the most cursed takes imaginable.”

Sometimes, it turns out, not trying is better than getting it wrong.

“If I were a single mother, who was also queer and a person of colour and suffered from a disability and was a refugee; I would support the affirmative team” first speaker and future school captain Alex Alexson waxed lyrically, in a totally unbelievable attempt to gain the sympathy of the room.

“You’d have to be a bigot to disagree,” third affirmative speaker and local bigot Sam Sommerton alleged, turning round to look at the girls on the opposing bench.

In the post-debate press conference, the girls on the negative team were more than a little confused.

“The topic was about whether sports teams should be held responsible for the behaviour of their fans,” second negative speaker Holly Smith, “I truly have no clue what they was yapping about.”

“Their third speaker tried to say they understood the burden of sexism because they had mothers and sister,” added the third negative speaker Lucy Speakgood, “did they not realise that we are literally women ourselves?”

The boys now eagerly awaits the adjudication, which pundits expect will result in a loss by about 50 thousand points.

More to come.

Former High School Debater Isn’t Cramming – They’re Just Practicing “Short Prep”

With a Foundations of Law assignment due at 3pm, most of the first-year law cohort was stressing out, refining their meticulously crafted essays and desperately editing their footnotes to be comma-perfect. But for former high school debating legend Albert Rimmington, this day couldn’t have been more chill.

“I’ve been preparing for this my whole life,” Albert claimed, “it’s basically just a short preparation debate, but a law essay instead of a topic about whether we should ban school uniforms.”

Albert’s classmates were intrigued at how he would manage to write a 2000-word assignment in only an hour, but Albert’s insistence that his faultless silent brainstorming technique would maximise efficiency assuaged their fears.

When asked what sources he would use to justify his position, Albert said “I’ll just BS it to be honest. That’s what worked when we won the 11.4 premiership. It’s not like examples and sources really matter much when the adjudicator doesn’t know if it’s real or not.”

“I’m not an ‘adjudicator’, I’m a career expert in constitutional law.” lamented seminar leader Stohn Muart-Jill.

Albert defended his take by suggesting “what if the negative team just asserts another fake statistic back?”

“That isn’t how this works,” responded Stohn, “hopefully Albert will learn when he gets his mark back”.

Four (if not even lower) to come.