(with some amendments by the Editor-in-Chief).
Hi everyone, Harry here with some tips if you don’t know who to vote for. I know there are important rules about avoiding ticketing, so I’ve asked Sienna to make some small adjustments if necessary to ensure impartiality, but I’m sure you’ll barely notice at all.
In the first contested election for president in many years, the three candidates are all running very strong campaigns with varying degrees of good ideas and absolute lunacy. Don’t forget to number every box, as preference flows could be critical in saving the law society from total destruction. My recommendation is:
1. [Redacted]
2. [Redacted]
3. [Redacted]
The Deputy-Presidential race is stereotypically huge yet again, with two very strong candidates promising basically the exact same things about being around and talking to people. But if you need to split the difference and decide who deserves your vote, you can’t go wrong with [redacted]. Truthfully, it was an easy decision for me, and it should be for you too.
There are about three thousand candidates for first year officer, and I don’t really know them, so my opinion isn’t the most informed. But that also means yours might not be too, so you might want some advice. From my basic research of their proposals and credentials, my top 3 candidates would have to be [redacted], [redacted] and [redacted]. Again, number every box, mostly because there’s one candidate I really don’t like and want to avoid them winning, and that of course is [redacted], so put them last.
Lastly, here are some quickfire suggestions for a couple of other races:
Careers VP: [redacted]
Education Officer: [redacted] and [redacted]
Treasurer: well, that’s not good. I’ll give some thoughts on the candidates running from the floor during my speech. But I hope [redacted] runs. Or [redacted]. Or [redacted]. Just please not [redacted].